🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.